Custom Search

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Predeterminers

Predeterminers

The predeterminers occur prior to other determiners (as you would probably guess from their name). This class of words includes multipliers (double, twice, four/five times . . . .); fractional expressions (one-third, three-quarters, etc.); the words both, half, and all; and intensifiers such as quite, rather, and such.

The multipliers precede plural count and mass nouns and occur with singular count nouns denoting number or amount:

  • This van holds three times the passengers as that sports car.
  • My wife is making double my / twice my salary.
  • This time we added five times the amount of water.



In fractional expressions, we have a similar construction, but here it can be replaced with "of" construction.

  • Charlie finished in one-fourth [of] the time his brother took.
  • Two-fifths of the respondents reported that half the medication was sufficient.

The intensifiers occur in this construction primarily in casual speech and writing and are more common in British English than they are in American English. The intensifier "what" is often found in stylistic fragments: "We visited my brother in his dorm room. What a mess!"

  • This room is rather a mess, isn't it?
  • The ticket-holders made quite a fuss when they couldn't get in.
  • What an idiot he turned out to be.
  • Our vacation was such a grand experience.
Half, both, and all can occur with singular and plural count nouns half and all can occur with mass nouns
There are also "of constructions" with these words ("all [of] the grain," "half [of] his salary"); the "of construction" is required with personal pronouns ("both of them," "all of it"). The following chart (from Quirk and Greenbaum) nicely describes the uses of these three predeterminers:
Predeterminers

Read More...

Articles, Determiners, and Quantifiers

Articles, Determiners,
and Quantifiers

Definition

Articles, determiners, and quantifiers are those little words that precede and modify nouns:

the teacher, a college, a bit of honey, that person, those people, whatever purpose, either way, your choice

Sometimes these words will tell the reader or listener whether we're referring to a specific or general thing (the garage out back; A horse! A horse! My kingdom for a horse!); sometimes they tell how much or how many (lots of trees, several books, a great deal of confusion). The choice of the proper article or determiner to precede a noun or noun phrase is usually not a problem for writers who have grown up speaking English, nor is it a serious problem for non-native writers whose first language is a romance language such as Spanish. For other writers, though, this can be a considerable obstacle on the way to their mastery of English. In fact, some students from eastern European countries — where their native language has either no articles or an altogether different system of choosing articles and determiners — find that these "little words" can create problems long after every other aspect of English has been mastered.



Determiners are said to "mark" nouns. That is to say, you know a determiner will be followed by a noun. Some categories of determiners are limited (there are only three articles, a handful of possessive pronouns, etc.), but the possessive nouns are as limitless as nouns themselves. This limited nature of most determiner categories, however, explains why determiners are grouped apart from adjectives even though both serve a modifying function. We can imagine that the language will never tire of inventing new adjectives; the determiners (except for those possessive nouns), on the other hand, are well established, and this class of words is not going to grow in number. These categories of determiners are as follows: the articles (an, a, the — see ; possessive nouns (Joe's, the priest's, my mother's); possessive pronouns, (his, your, their, whose, etc.); numbers (one, two, etc.); indefinite pronouns (few, more, each, every, either, all, both, some, any, etc.); and demonstrative pronouns. The demonstratives (this, that, these, those, such) are discussed in the section on Demonstrative Pronoun. Notice that the possessive nouns differ from the other determiners in that they, themselves, are often accompanied by other determiners: "my mother's rug," "the priests's collar," "a dog's life."

This categorization of determiners is based on Understanding English Grammar by Martha Kolln. 4rth Edition. MacMillan Publishing Company: New York. 1994.

Some Notes on Quantifiers

Like articles, quantifiers are words that precede and modify nouns. They tell us how many or how much. Selecting the correct quantifier depends on your understanding the distinction betweenCount and Non-Count Nouns. For our purposes, we will choose the count noun trees and the non-count noun dancing:

#The following quantifiers will work with count nouns:
many trees
a few trees
few trees
several trees
a couple of trees
none of the trees

#The following quantifiers will work with non-count nouns:
not much dancing
a little dancing
little dancing
a bit of dancing
a good deal of dancing
a great deal of dancing
no dancing

#The following quantifiers will work with both count and non-count nouns:
all of the trees/dancing
some trees/dancing
most of the trees/dancing
enough trees/dancing
a lot of trees/dancing
lots of trees/dancing
plenty of trees/dancing
a lack of trees/dancing

In formal academic writing, it is usually better to use many and much rather than phrases such as a lot of, lots of and plenty of.

There is an important difference between "a little" and "little" (used with non-count words) and between "a few" and "few" (used with count words). If I say that Tashonda has a little experience in management that means that although Tashonda is no great expert she does have some experience and that experience might well be enough for our purposes. If I say that Tashonda has little experience in management that means that she doesn't have enough experience. If I say that Charlie owns a few books on Latin American literature that means that he has some some books — not a lot of books, but probably enough for our purposes. If I say that Charlie owns few books on Latin American literature, that means he doesn't have enough for our purposes and we'd better go to the library.

Unless it is combined with of, the quantifier "much" is reserved for questions and negative statements:

  • Much of the snow has already melted.
  • How much snow fell yesterday?
  • Not much.

Note that the quantifier "most of the" must include the definite article the when it modifies a specific noun, whether it's a count or a non-count noun: "most of the instructors at this college have a doctorate"; "most of the water has evaporated." With a general plural noun, however (when you are not referring to a specific entity), the "of the" is dropped:

  • Most colleges have their own admissions policy.
  • Most students apply to several colleges.

Authority for this last paragraph: The Scott, Foresman Handbook for Writers by Maxine Hairston and John J. Ruszkiewicz. 4th ed. HarperCollins: New York. 1996. Examples our own.

An indefinite article is sometimes used in conjunction with the quantifier many, thus joining a plural quantifier with a singular noun (which then takes a singular verb):

  • Many a young man has fallen in love with her golden hair.
  • Many an apple has fallen by October.

Read More...

Thursday, November 13, 2008

Modals: Shall versus Will

shall versus wiill

People may sometimes tell you that there is no difference between shall and will, or even that today nobody uses shall (except in offers such as "Shall I call a taxi?"). This is not really true. The difference between shall and will is often hidden by the fact that we usually contract them in speaking with 'll. But the difference does exist.




The truth is that there are two conjugations for the verb will:

1st Conjugation (objective, simple statement of fact)

PersonVerbExampleContraction
SingularIshallI shall be in London tomorrow.I'll
youwillYou will see a large building on the left.You'll
he, she, itwillHe will be wearing blue.He'll
PluralweshallWe shall not be there when you arrive.We shan't
youwillYou will find his office on the 7th floor.You'll
theywillThey will arrive late.They'll
2nd Conjugation (subjective, strong assertion, promise or command)

PersonVerbExampleContraction
SingularIwillI will do everything possible to help.I'll
youshallYou shall be sorry for this.You'll
he, she, itshallIt shall be done.It'll
PluralwewillWe will not interfere.We won't
youshallYou shall do as you're told.You'll
theyshallThey shall give one month's notice.They'll

It is true that this difference is not universally recognized. However, let those who make assertions such as "People in the USA never use 'shall'" peruse a good US English dictionary, or many US legal documents which often contain phrases such as:

  • Each party shall give one month's notice in writing in the event of termination.

Note that exactly the same rule applies in the case of should and would. It is perfectly normal, and somewhat more elegant, to write, for example:

  • I should be grateful if you would kindly send me your latest catalogue.

Read More...

Modals: Shall versus Will

Shall versus Will

People may sometimes tell you that there is no difference between shall and will, or even that today nobody uses shall (except in offers such as "Shall I call a taxi?"). This is not really true. The difference between shall and will is often hidden by the fact that we usually contract them in speaking with 'll. But the difference does exist.

The truth is that there are two conjugations for the verb will:

1st Conjugation (objective, simple statement of fact)
PersonVerbExampleContraction
SingularIshallI shall be in London tomorrow.I'll
youwillYou will see a large building on the left.You'll
he, she, itwillHe will be wearing blue.He'll
PluralweshallWe shall not be there when you arrive.We shan't
youwillYou will find his office on the 7th floor.You'll
theywillThey will arrive late.They'll
2nd Conjugation (subjective, strong assertion, promise or command)
PersonVerbExampleContraction
SingularIwillI will do everything possible to help.I'll
youshallYou shall be sorry for this.You'll
he, she, itshallIt shall be done.It'll
PluralwewillWe will not interfere.We won't
youshallYou shall do as you're told.You'll
theyshallThey shall give one month's notice.They'll

It is true that this difference is not universally recognized. However, let those who make assertions such as "People in the USA never use 'shall'" peruse a good US English dictionary, or many US legal documents which often contain phrases such as:

  • Each party shall give one month's notice in writing in the event of termination.

Note that exactly the same rule applies in the case of should and would. It is perfectly normal, and somewhat more elegant, to write, for example:

  • I should be grateful if you would kindly send me your latest catalogue.

Read More...

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Modal: Must Not

Must not, Mustn't (prohibition)

We use must not to say that something is not permitted or allowed, for example:

  • Passengers must not talk to the driver.

Structure of Must not

Must is an auxiliary verb. It is followed by a main verb. The structure for must not is:

subject + must not + main verb

The main verb is the base verb (infinitive without "to").

Look at these examples:

subjectauxiliary must + notmain verb
Imustn'tforgetmy keys.
Youmustn'tdisturbhim.
Studentsmust notbelate.

NB: like all auxiliary verbs, must CANNOT be followed by "to". So, we say:

  • You mustn't arrive late. (not You mustn't to arrive late.)

Use of Must not

Must not expresses prohibition - something that is not permitted, not allowed. The prohibition can be subjective (the speaker's opinion) or objective (a real law or rule). Look at these examples:

  • I mustn't eat so much sugar. (subjective)
  • You mustn't watch so much television. (subjective)
  • Students must not leave bicycles here. (objective)
  • Policemen must not drink on duty. (objective)

We can use must not to talk about the present or the future:

  • Visitors must not smoke. (present)
  • I mustn't forget Tara's birthday. (future)

We cannot use must not to talk about the past. We use other structures to talk about the past, for example:

  • We were not allowed to enter.
  • I couldn't park outside the shop.

Read More...

Modal: Must

Must (subjective obligation)

We often use must to say that something is essential or necessary, for example:

  • I must go.

Structure of Must

Must is a modal auxiliary verb. It is followed by a main verb. The structure is:

subject + must + main verb

The main verb is the base verb (infinitive without "to").

Look at these examples:

subjectauxiliary mustmain verb
Imustgohome.
Youmustvisitus.
Wemuststopnow.

Use of Must

In general, must expresses personal obligation. Must expresses what the speaker thinks is necessary. Must is subjective. Look at these examples:

  • I must stop smoking.
  • You must visit us soon.
  • He must work harder.

In each of the above cases, the "obligation" is the opinion or idea of the person speaking. In fact, it is not a real obligation. It is not imposed from outside.

We can use must to talk about the present or the future. Look at these examples:

  • I must go now. (present)
  • I must call my mother tomorrow. (future)

We cannot use must to talk about the past. We use HAVE TO to talk about the past.

Read More...

Modal: Have to

Have to (objective obligation)

We often use have to to say that something is obligatory, for example:

  • Children have to go to school.

Structure of Have to

Have to is often grouped with modal auxiliary verbs for convenience, but in fact it is not a modal verb. It is not even an auxiliary verb. In the have to structure, "have" is a main verb. The structure is:

subject + auxiliary verb + have + infinitive (with to)

Look at these examples in the simple tense:


subjectauxiliary verbmain verb haveinfinitive (with to)
+She
hasto work.
-Ido nothaveto seethe doctor.
?Didyouhaveto goto school?

Use of Have to

In general, have to expresses impersonal obligation. The subject of have to is obliged or forced to act by a separate, external power (for example, the Law or school rules). Have to is objective. Look at these examples:

  • In France, you have to drive on the right.
  • In England, most schoolchildren have to wear a uniform.
  • John has to wear a tie at work.

In each of the above cases, the obligation is not the subject's opinion or idea. The obligation is imposed from outside.

We can use have to in all tenses, and also with modal auxiliaries. We conjugate it just like any other main verb. Here are some examples:

subjectauxiliary verbmain verb haveinfinitive
past simpleI hadto workyesterday.
present simpleI haveto worktoday.
future simpleIwillhaveto worktomorrow.
present continuousSheishavingto wait.
present perfectWehavehadto changethe time.
modal (may)Theymayhaveto doit again.

Read More...

Saturday, November 1, 2008

Modals: Be Able To

Be able to

Although we look at be able to here, it is not a modal verb. It is simply the verb be plus an adjective (able) followed by the infinitive. We look at be able to here because we sometimes use it instead of can and could.

We use be able to:

  • to talk about ability

Structure of Be able to

The structure of be able to is:

subject + be + able + infinitive

subjectbe
main verb
able
adjective
infinitive
+Iamableto drive.
-Sheis notableto drive.
isn't
?Areyouableto drive?

Notice that be able to is possible in all tenses, for example:

  • I was able to drive...
  • I will be able to drive...
  • I have been able to drive...

Notice too that be able to has an infinitive form:

  • I would like to be able to speak Chinese.

Use of Be able to

WSM Image
Be able to is not a modal auxiliary verb. We include it here for convenience, because it is often used like "can" and "could", which are modal auxiliary verbs.

be able to: ability

We use be able to to express ability. "Able" is an adjective meaning: having the power, skill or means to do something. If we say "I am able to swim", it is like saying "I can swim". We sometimes use "be able to" instead of "can" or "could" for ability. "Be able to" is possible in all tenses - but "can" is possible only in the present and "could" is possible only in the past for ability. In addition, "can" and "could" have no infinitive form. So we use "be able to" when we want to use other tenses or the infinitive. Look at these examples:

  • I have been able to swim since I was five. (present perfect)
  • You will be able to speak perfect English very soon. (future simple)
  • I would like to be able to fly an airplane. (infinitive)

Read More...